NFT Royalties Why artists love NFT Royalties, and traders do not


Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) have been a real blessing in disguise for artists and collectors alike. They provide artists with a global platform to showcase and sell their work. On the other hand, Blockchain Technology Network allows buyers to rapidly verify their ownership and the authenticity of an artwork.


This makes NFTs a win-win for both artists and traders. It is one of the crucial reasons why these Digital Assets have become so widespread in the current market, with more than USD 42 billion in total revenue coming this year, according to a report by Chain analysis.


Also Read: Celsius Withdraws Motion To Hire CFO Back At $92,000 Per Month

Also Read: Jewelry Giant Tiffany To Sell CryptoPunk NFT Pendants For Ethereum


However, possibly the most significant advantage for artists arises in the form of NFT royalties. This characteristic allows artists to earn a passive income on the subsequent sales of their artwork, something that is hardly ever possible in the real world.


Read along as we describe what NFT royalties are and why artists love them and why the topic was abuzz on Twitter over the weekend.


What are NFT Royalties?


The traditional means of creating and selling an artwork would never allow the creators to take home a percent from secondary sales. In contrast, Web3.0 intends at paying such creators in an ongoing manner. Whenever an NFT is sold, regardless of how many hands it exchanges, the artists get a certain percentage of the total sale amount, known as a royalty.


Artists can fix a royalty percent in the smart contract during the minting of the NFT. Generally, the royalties vary from 5 percent to 10 percent, and the amount is automatically credited to the artist is wallet once a subsequent sale is completed.


Why do NFT Royalties Matter?


Lets assume: a struggling creator needs urgent cash to cover his expenses. What does he do? He/she sells off one of the artworks for a few hundred dollars and breathes a sigh of relief – he now has the cash in hand to pay installments, cover utility bills and whatnot.



However, after a week, the same artwork is sold again at an auction for millions of dollars. Being its creator, the artist cannot stake a claim on the artwork, nor will the creator receive any proceeds from the re-sale in the auction. This is where NFT royalties come in and become life save. They ensure that the creators receive passive payouts from the subsequent sales of a painting.


The music market has a royalty model too. If an artist is blessed enough to get a royalty deal, they will be rewarded for all the album sales and re-sales and radio airtime. However, record labels and involved parties rarely provide clear and honest accounts of sales. Fortunately, Blockchain Technology Network and smart contracts can!


Why do not traders like Royalty Payments?


While creators enjoy perpetual re-sale disbursements, traders may not. They have to split out the royalty over and above the artwork’s sale price. Since NFTs demand thousands, sometimes millions of dollars in the bull market, this royalty fee can mount up to a significant amount.


Also Read: Coinbase Exchange Is Rapid Rise Left It Exposed In Crypto Winter


Why are NFT Royalties in the publicity these days?


To attract more shoppers, several upcoming NFT platforms and exchanges have stopped honoring artist royalties. It has set off lengthy conversations on Twitter, with users debating on whether NFT creators should be paid ongoing royalties for secondary market trades.


It all started earlier this year when Yawww, an NFT marketplace built on the Solana network, launched without enabling royalties. This was followed by, SudoAMM, an Ethereum NFT marketplace from Sudoswap that does not honor creator royalties on sales.


Finally, on 13th August, another Solana-based NFT marketplace, Solanart, allowed sellers to choose whether they want to pay artists a royalty fee and decide how much they want to payout.


The uproar


Following the launch of these NFT platform and marketplaces, several creators and collectors debated that denying royalties was against the Web3 ethics. Until now, NFTs were an equitable market in which artists were richly rewarded for their work, including ongoing royalty payouts.


“We are building the first blocks of what will become a digital civilization. Royalty payments are a broader statement that we value creatives.”


Also Read: 75% Of Institutions To Use Cryptocurrency In Next Three Years: Ripple 


Web2 and the others also debated such moves would restrict the ability of independent artists to thrive in the Web3 space.


“​​Saying no to creator royalty payments will result in only projects with VC funding to be able to develop anything continuously, cutting out a large percent of the population due to the implicit bias that exists within the VC world,” tweeted the pseudonymous Betty, co-creator of Deadfellaz, an Ethereum NFT collection.


Can you dodge paying Royalty fees?


While leading NFT platforms and marketplaces such as OpenSea, LooksRare, and Magic Eden honor the royalty characteristics of the NFTs traded on their platforms, it is not a very stringent technological characteristic. Users can easily avoid NFT royalties despite the presence of smart contracts.


For example, a smart contract that governs an NFT (including its royalty payment provisions) will work only on the Blockchain Network where it was created, say Ethereum.


But the same smart contract will not be enforceable on another blockchain network, say Solana. In this case, the trade can be executed offline, and the royalty payment to the original creator can be overlooked.



Ongoing royalty payment to artists and creators is the central idea of the web3 ecosystem. However, even with platforms that honor royalty payments, there is a walkaround that can cheat creators out of their deserved payments.


Therefore, while NFT royalty payments are a significant boon for creators, the NFT industry needs to work toward building better guidelines to reward artists.


Solana Co-founder, Anatoly Yakovenko, suggested that artists could start adding instructions to “freeze assets” into their NFT contracts as this would create a harsh punishment for royalty payment avoiders.


Leave a Comment


CryptoHelpExchange disclaims all liability for any mistakes on this website (including omissions or inaccurate material). Even if they are the consequence of mistakes, CryptoHelpExchange disclaims all liability for any trading or investment losses caused by visitors.

Without the express consent of CryptoHelpExchange, no part of the written information on this website may be duplicated. If it is discovered that material is being copied without CryptoHelpExchange's consent, that organization will pursue legal action against those responsible to the fullest extent permitted by the law. The aforementioned rule does not apply to any RSS feeds that CryptoHelpExchange offers or situations where explicit permission from CryptoHelpExchange was given.

Your single and only option if you disagree with any of the terms as stated above is to stop using CryptoHelpExchange.